filaments:carbon_nanotubes
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
filaments:carbon_nanotubes [2025/01/26 01:08] – scarecrow | filaments:carbon_nanotubes [2025/01/26 06:43] (current) – tys-user | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== Carbon Nano Tubes (CNTs) and Carbon Nano Fibers (CNF' | + | ====== |
+ | **Or, "Carbon Nano Tubes (CNTs) and Carbon Nano Fibers (CNF' | ||
- | everything in life has some element of danger, see [[: | + | ==== What and Where are Carbon Nanotubes? ==== |
+ | Carbon Nano Tubes are found in ESD-Safe filaments from various companies such as 3DXTECH or Polymaker. Despite being available to the general public, significant health risks are posed by CNTs to people' | ||
- | The Problem with Carbon Nano Tube (CNT's) filled filament | + | CNT and Carbon Nano Fibers |
- | Carbon Nano Tubes found in EDS-Safe filaments from various companies, such as 3DXTECH or Polymaker, that are available to the general public and the significant health risk that CNT pose to peoples health if they are exposed to the fibres. | + | ==== What are the Risks? ==== |
- | CNT and CNF are completely different | + | Based on a significant amount of evidence collected by the CDC since 2013 and other research papers(([[https:// |
- | This is based on a significant amount of evidence collected by the CDC since 2013 and from research | + | In 2013 the CDC released Current Intelligence Bulletin 65(([[https:// |
- | "Three-dimensional printer emissions | + | **"...all types of CNT and CNF should be considered a respiratory hazard and exposure should be controlled below the REL."** |
- | The CDC back in 2013 released the linked Current Intelligence Bulletin going into great detail about what Carbon Nano Tubes are, the research and information about the health risks that they pose and that exposure to them in a workplace should be below 1 ug/m3 in a 8 hour Time Weighted Average (TWA) and that, | + | For context, the following is a list of high risk chemicals for the same TWA period: |
- | " | + | ^ Substance |
+ | |Hydrogen Cyanide | ||
+ | |Benzene | ||
+ | |Lead |50 | | ||
+ | |Quartz (Silica) | ||
+ | |Arsenic | ||
+ | |Carbon Nano Tubes (CNTs) | ||
- | For context, the follow is a list of high risk chemicals for the same TWA period | + | ==== What this Means to You ==== |
- | Substance | + | A TWA of 1ug/m3 for CNT's by comparison to something like Arsenic at 10ug/m3, reflects how serious the CDC considers the risk they pose. For you reading this, ask yourself: |
- | Lead 50 | + | |
- | Quartz (Silica) | + | "Do you want to be exposed to something with a higher risk to your health then Lead, Benzene or Quartz silica dust? The same types of dust that cause silicosis, lung cancer and other respiratory diseases? |
- | + | ||
- | Benzene | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Hydrogen Cyanide | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Arsenic | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Carbon Nano Tubes 1 | + | |
- | (CNTs) | + | |
- | + | ||
- | A TWA of 1ug/m3 for CNT's by comparison to something like Arsenic at 10ug/m3, reflects how serious the CDC considers the risk they pose and that for you reading this, ask yourself this, | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Do you want to be exposed to something with a higher risk to your health then Lead, Benzene or Quartz silica dust, the type of dust that causes | + | |
The type, level and detail of control measures listed by the CDC in relation to CNF to limit and track exposure to such a high risk material is well outside the average consumer to implement and factor in when handling, printing or post processing 3d printer filaments and parts with this material in it. | The type, level and detail of control measures listed by the CDC in relation to CNF to limit and track exposure to such a high risk material is well outside the average consumer to implement and factor in when handling, printing or post processing 3d printer filaments and parts with this material in it. | ||
Line 42: | Line 36: | ||
This is further compounded by a systemic lack of any detailed information provided about the health risks of CNT in the 3D printing space and the recent discussions raised around Carbon Fibre in filaments which are not even close to CNT and CNF in the health risks they pose. | This is further compounded by a systemic lack of any detailed information provided about the health risks of CNT in the 3D printing space and the recent discussions raised around Carbon Fibre in filaments which are not even close to CNT and CNF in the health risks they pose. | ||
- | It is 2024, the risks of CNT have been known about since 2013 and the most recent technical report 2022-153 from the CDS on this issue (attached) continues to echo the same limit of 1ug/ | + | It is <del>2024</ |
" | " | ||
- | Please if you value your health and the health of others inside this space please share and spread the information and help to keep people safe from serious life impacting health issues while enjoying a hobby. | + | **Please, if you value your health and the health of others inside this space please share and spread the information and help to keep people safe from serious life impacting health issues while enjoying a hobby.** |
+ | |||
+ | ==== Takeaway ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | CNT and CNF filled parts are on the same level of heath risk as asbestos fibre products. Just like asbestos fibres, parts produced with CNT/CNF fill will always be a ticking time bomb of fibres being released during the life of a product containing them in addition to the fibres released during printing. | ||
filaments/carbon_nanotubes.1737853723.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025/01/26 01:08 by scarecrow